Our elections tutorial is terrible
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 118
- Forks
- 161
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The code seems at best loosely connected to its own descriptions, and the input dataset is absurdly complicated.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the elections tutorial, comparing its code with the descriptions and examining the input dataset. Clarify the intended example and simplify the dataset where possible. Done means the tutorial's code, explanations, and dataset are coherent and understandable together.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100