httpclient.close() isn't really safe
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 58
- Forks
- 35
- Avg merge
- 22h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
MOVED FROM: https://github.com/restify/node-restify/issues/642
HttpClient.close() reaches into the Node agent and calls end() on all of the sockets in use by the agent. It doesn't check that the socket's remote address matches the server that the client was created with. More importantly, though, the Node documentation says not to touch these sockets, and the problem with doing this is that if you call client.close() and then try to make another request (with a different client or even outside restify, AFAICT), the Node agent may decide to use one of the sockets that has started closing, and it will immediately get a "socket hang up" error.
I don't think there's a great way to implement close() given the current agent API, but what restify's doing right now makes it possible to run into bugs like node-manta#194. If the point of close() is basically for command-line programs to wrap things up, then it should probably be a global function (i.e., not per-agent), since it's closing everything, and it probably needs to be provided by the agent implementation.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the HttpClient.close() implementation and the Node agent API documentation, focusing on how it handles sockets. Reproduce the reported sequence of calling close() and then making another request, including the node-manta#194 case if available. Done requires a decided, safe close() behavior that avoids causing subsequent requests to fail with a socket hang up.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100