rescript-lang / rescript-lang/rescript
Should use `in` for optional fields check
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- OCaml
- Stars
- 7.5k
- Forks
- 485
- Avg merge
- 1d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 55
Description
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file, test, or entry point is named. Open the linked ReScript playground example first and inspect the generated JavaScript around the optional-fields check; trace the compiler path you find, with completion indicated when the generated check uses in and the example still behaves correctly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, ocaml
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100