redhat-et / redhat-et/ProtoBot
Implement the governed Git change-set workflow and repository fixture
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 23h 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 66
Description
Plan ID
EM-07
Purpose
Exercise the approved ears-manager behavior through the governed single-player Git workflow.
Scope
- Create change-set branches using the documented naming and base-commit rules.
- Stage only registered specification paths, manifests, project configuration, and manager-owned projection entries.
- Prepare deterministic commits and pull-request summaries from
compareandimpact. - Reject direct specification edits, unregistered paths, forbidden branches, force pushes, and default-branch pushes.
- Implement the local bare-repository fixture covering initialization, proposal, refresh, merge, and registration evidence.
Dependencies
Depends on EM-05 and EM-06. The Git contract in #34 is complete.
Acceptance criteria
- The fixture demonstrates a complete initialize, propose, validate, branch, commit, refresh, and merge flow.
- Every failure leaves the repository unchanged or provides a deterministic retry path.
- Only explicitly owned paths are staged.
- Approved change-set manifests are immutable.
- The fixture proves registration is idempotent by change-set and merge commit.
Out of scope
WMS lifecycle transitions and Job Site execution remain outside this issue.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the completed Git contract in #34 and review the dependencies on EM-05 and EM-06 before tracing the existing ears-manager entry points. Exercise the local bare-repository fixture through initialization, proposal, validation, branching, commit, refresh, and merge. Done means the acceptance criteria are demonstrated, including owned-path staging, immutable manifests, deterministic failures, and idempotent registration evidence.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- git, go
- Domain
- developer-experience, devtools
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100