redhat-developer / redhat-developer/vscode-java
Renaming fields causes conflicts with variable naming, resulting in changes in code behavior
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 546
- Avg merge
- 20h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
[provide a description of the issue]
Environment
- Operating System:
- JDK version:
- Visual Studio Code version:
- Java extension version:
Steps To Reproduce
1.select "originalField"
2.click “Rename”
3. new name "originalFieldRenamed"
class MyClass {
// rename "originalField" to "originalFieldRenamed"
private final int originalField = 10;
protected int protectedField;
public void myMethod() {
int originalFieldRenamed = 20; // Local variable with the same name as the field
System.out.println(originalField);
}
}
refactoring result:
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the listed rename steps in the Java example and compare the resulting references with the intended field rename. Trace the Java rename-refactoring path to identify why a local variable with the new field name changes behavior; done means the rename preserves the local variable and field semantics for this example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java, typescript, vscode
- Domain
- developer-experience, devtools
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100