recloudstream / recloudstream/cloudstream
Separate Extension Containers for different user profiles
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Kotlin
- Stars
- 10.7k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 15
Description
Describe your suggested feature
Currently extensions are shared among different user profiles.
It would be better if there were separate extension containers for different user profiles.
i.e. different profiles could have different set of extensions.
In addition to that providing the ability to import certain (or all) extensions from another user profile could be given as a separate option.
Other details
No response
Acknowledgements
- I have searched the existing issues and this is a new ticket, NOT a duplicate or related to another open issue.
- I have written a short but informative title.
- I will fill out all of the requested information in this form.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by mapping how user profiles and extensions are represented in the Android app, then define the profile isolation and import behavior before identifying tests that demonstrate completion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- android, kotlin
- Domain
- mobile
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100