[refmt] Weird formatting of record member access following function call
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Printer
- Dominant language
- OCaml
- Stars
- 10.3k
- Forks
- 438
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I've been playing around with Rely and stumbled upon this weird formatting behavior while writing tests:
expect.option(
Some("a very very very very very very very very very very long line"),
).
toBeSome();
I believe it will be more readable to format it as follows:
expect.option(
Some("a very very very very very very very very very very long line"),
).toBeSome();
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the formatting with refmt using the Reason snippet in the issue, then trace the formatter logic for record-member access after a function call. Done means the same input formats with .toBeSome() on the preceding line as shown in the expected output.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ocaml
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100