<> ...foo </> should probably have a better syntax error
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Error messages
Syntax
- Dominant language
- OCaml
- Stars
- 10.3k
- Forks
- 438
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Edit: maybe we should just support this syntax. Any idea what this should desugar to? (Needs to be able to be picked up by the ReasonReact JSX PPX, maybe)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no source file or test. Start by locating the parser path for <> ...foo </> and checking how ReasonReact’s JSX PPX would consume the syntax. Clarify the intended desugaring and whether to support the syntax or improve its error; done requires an agreed behavior and corresponding tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ocaml
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100