`isolation` should be after `mutators` in the default for `modifier_order`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Swift
- Stars
- 19.7k
- Forks
- 2.3k
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
New Issue Checklist
- I've Updated SwiftLint to the latest version.
- I've searched for existing GitHub issues.
Feature or Enhancement Proposal
isolation should be after mutators in the default for modifier_order. Search for actor-isolation-modifier on https://docs.swift.org/swift-book/documentation/the-swift-programming-language/summaryofthegrammar.
I would imagine that the Swift language reference wouldn't consistently list actor-isolation-modifier after both access-level-modifier & mutation-modifier if they recommend that, e.g., nonisolated should be written before private.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the SwiftLint source for the default modifier_order configuration and references to actor-isolation-modifier. Compare the current order with the Swift language reference linked in the issue; done means the default places isolation after mutators and the relevant existing checks pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- swift
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100