Error when using the name "unit" for something in a class
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bug
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 575
- Forks
- 106
- Avg merge
- 2h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
What version of Racket are you using?
Racket CS 7.9
What program did you run?
#lang typed/racket
(define foo%
(class object%
(init [unit : String])
(super-new)
(: _unit String)
(define _unit unit)
(: get-unit (-> String))
(define/public (get-unit) _unit)))
(new foo% [unit "kg"])
What should have happened?
The above should work the same as this:
#lang racket
(define foo%
(class object%
(init unit)
(super-new)
(define _unit unit)
(define/public (get-unit) _unit)))
(new foo% [unit "kg"])
If you got an error message, please include it here.
unit: bad syntax in: unit
More info:
Renaming unit to bar works in the typed/racket version.
Switching to typed/racket/base also works.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by running the reported typed/racket program with the unit initializer and compare it with the working untyped and typed/racket/base examples. Trace where unit: bad syntax is produced; done means the typed/racket example accepts (new foo% [unit "kg"]) with the same behavior as the untyped version.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100