racket / racket/typed-racket

Error when using the name "unit" for something in a class

Open
#994 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

bug
Dominant language
Racket
Stars
575
Forks
106
Avg merge
2h 1m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

What version of Racket are you using?

Racket CS 7.9

What program did you run?
 #lang typed/racket
 
 (define foo%
   (class object%
     (init [unit : String])
     (super-new)
     (: _unit String)
     (define _unit unit)
     (: get-unit (-> String))
     (define/public (get-unit) _unit)))

 (new foo% [unit "kg"])
What should have happened?

The above should work the same as this:

 #lang racket
 
 (define foo%
   (class object%
     (init unit)
     (super-new)
     (define _unit unit)
     (define/public (get-unit) _unit)))
 
 (new foo% [unit "kg"])
If you got an error message, please include it here.
unit: bad syntax in: unit
More info:

Renaming unit to bar works in the typed/racket version.
Switching to typed/racket/base also works.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by running the reported typed/racket program with the unit initializer and compare it with the working untyped and typed/racket/base examples. Trace where unit: bad syntax is produced; done means the typed/racket example accepts (new foo% [unit "kg"]) with the same behavior as the untyped version.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
compilers
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.