for/first should be smarter
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 575
- Forks
- 106
- Avg merge
- 2h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
#lang typed/racket
(ann (for/first : Boolean ([x : Integer (in-list (build-list 10 add1))])
(equal? x 17))
Boolean)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue includes only a Typed Racket example and does not name an implementation file, test, entry point, or expected behavior. Clarify what “smarter” means for for/first before locating the relevant type-checking code and defining completion tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100