racket / racket/typed-racket

simple integer refinement totality check

Open
#697 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@pnwamk is already working on this.

Since Apr 19, 2018.

Dominant language
Racket
Stars
575
Forks
106
Avg merge
2h 1m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

It seems reasonable to expect Typed Racket to succeed in checking the following program:

#lang typed/racket #:with-refinements

(define-type SomeInts (Refine [n : Byte] (<= #x13 n #x15)))

    
(: foo (-> SomeInts Symbol))
(define (foo x)
  (case x
    [(#x13) 'RemoteUserTerminated]
    [(#x14) 'RemoteDeviceTerminatedLowResources]
    [(#x15) 'RemoteDeviceTerminatedPowerOff]))

i.e. although there's a nasty implicit else (void) that is inserted by the case macro, we should be able to prove that code is dead. Instead, we get this error message:

Type Checker: type mismatch
  expected: Symbol
  given: Void in: (case x ((19) (quote RemoteUserTerminated)) ((20) (quote RemoteDeviceTerminatedLowResources)) ((21) (quote RemoteDeviceTerminatedPowerOff)))

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.