`:print-type` doesn't print proposition correctly.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 575
- Forks
- 106
- Avg merge
- 2h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
What version of Racket are you using?
v8.5 [cs]
What program did you run?
Welcome to Racket v8.5 [cs].
> (: andmap1 (All (A) (-> (Listof Any) (pred A) Boolean : #:+ (Listof A) #:- (! (Listof A)))))
> (:print-type andmap1)
(All (A) (-> (Listof Any) (-> Any Boolean : A) Boolean))
>
What should have happened?
Welcome to Racket v8.5 [cs].
> (: andmap1 (All (A) (-> (Listof Any) (pred A) Boolean : #:+ (Listof A) #:- (! (Listof A)))))
> (:print-type andmap1)
(All (A) (-> (Listof Any) (-> Any Boolean : A) Boolean : #:+ (Listof A) #:- (! (Listof A))))
>
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the issue in the Racket v8.5 [cs] REPL with the shown andmap1 type and :print-type command, then trace the :print-type entry point. No source file or test is named; the work is done when the printed proposition includes the expected #:+ and #:- clauses.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100