Some solution to the "no-value" value,
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 601
- Forks
- 74
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Some solution to the "no-value" value, which could be such a blessed value, or it could be a way to say that some function accepts all the keywords as some other function. (Possibly related to the above, of course.)
from Wishlist of backwards incompatible things for a future Racket2. #33
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading this issue together with the referenced “Wishlist of backwards incompatible things for a future Racket2” issue (#33). The issue proposes a solution for a “no-value” value or a way for one function to accept all keywords accepted by another, but does not identify files, tests, or an implementation boundary. Done would require a decided design and an agreed implementation scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100