Generic order relations
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 601
- Forks
- 74
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
See RRFI [Draft]: Equality and Order Relations Interface
This issue is splintered off from #16 to contain discussion on issues that pertain to generic order relations specifically (e.g. generic interfaces like the proposed gen:orderable, conventions for order-related APIs). The other one will continue to be used for equality-oriented discussion. The composite relations <= and >= and any attendant discussion around the relationship between order and equality could be carried on in either issue as the discussion warrants.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the linked “RRFI [Draft]: Equality and Order Relations Interface” and the discussion in issue #16 first. Clarify the intended generic orderable interface and conventions for order-related APIs; the issue is done only when the design questions have a settled direction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100