Feature request: explicit derivations for moded judgments
Open
@wilbowma is already working on this.
Since Oct 4, 2019.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 112
- Forks
- 42
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Just noticed that you introduced modeless judgments and the ability to check explicit derivations. Nice!
But what if I want to check an explicit derivation on a moded judgment? This is useful when teaching and when debugging judgments I think ought to hold but Redex claims do not.
(Would be particularly useful if judgment-holds could tell me which step in a derivation didn't hold, instead of just giving #f, but I could probably construct that feature in user-land)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.