[RFC] merge [some|all] of unstable/gui/redex into redex
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 112
- Forks
- 42
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I personally constantly use the following definitions from unstable/gui/redex when using redex:
binary-rw
prefix-rw
postfix-rw
function-rw
constant-rw
bracket-rw
set-cons-rw
Is there any desire to merge some/all of unstable/gui/redex into redex proper? Or is there a different approach that should be used towards making better high-level abstractions that aid in rewriting?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the definitions listed in unstable/gui/redex and their documentation at the linked unstable-redex reference. Determine whether some or all should move into redex proper, or whether another abstraction is preferred; the issue does not define a settled scope or completion criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100