racket / racket/redex

[RFC] merge [some|all] of unstable/gui/redex into redex

Open
#150 8 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Racket
Stars
112
Forks
42
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I personally constantly use the following definitions from unstable/gui/redex when using redex:

binary-rw
prefix-rw
postfix-rw
function-rw
constant-rw
bracket-rw
set-cons-rw

Is there any desire to merge some/all of unstable/gui/redex into redex proper? Or is there a different approach that should be used towards making better high-level abstractions that aid in rewriting?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the definitions listed in unstable/gui/redex and their documentation at the linked unstable-redex reference. Determine whether some or all should move into redex proper, or whether another abstraction is preferred; the issue does not define a settled scope or completion criteria.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.