DrRacket notebook mode
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 516
- Forks
- 103
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
copied from rfc at
https://github.com/racket/rhombus-brainstorming/issues/100
DrRacket notebook mode (like Jupyter) or hooks to support integration with Jupyter and similar products/
I raised it because it seems like notebook mode support is important in any new language. I think this doubly true for LOP where the intent is to have multiple interoperable languages co-existing?
--
Previous discussion on DrRacket Notebook Mode and the existing IPython/Jupyter kernel include:
- 2018-12-20 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/racket-users/MsAh2aBU5Sw
- 2019-06-26 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/XQXYxtCM2-k/AbTTqMqlAgAJ
- 2019-07-24 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/XQXYxtCM2-k/C97eRavaBQAJ
--
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not name files, tests, or an entry point. Start by reading the linked RFC and the referenced DrRacket/Jupyter discussions; the scope and acceptance criteria for notebook mode or integration hooks still need to be defined.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter
- Domain
- desktop-dev, developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100