check-syntax only draws an arrow when an additional definition is present in unit
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
check-syntax
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 516
- Forks
- 103
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
#lang racket
(unit
(import)
(export)
(define x 1)
(define y 2)
x)
Draws the arrows I expect, but in
#lang racket
(unit
(import)
(export)
(define x 1)
x)
check-syntax reports no bound occurences of x. Even though the expansion has a disappeared-binding property for x.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the two unit examples in DrRacket and compare the check-syntax arrows with the expansion's disappeared-binding property for x. Trace the check-syntax handling of a unit containing one versus multiple definitions; done means the single-definition example reports the bound occurrence of x and draws the expected arrow.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100