Fix citation
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 75
- Forks
- 32
- Avg merge
- 2h 49m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Double "Kindly cite the 'pxweb' R package as follows:"
pxweb_cite(px_data)
Statistics Sweden (2026). “Population by region, marital status, age, sex
and year.” [Data accessed 2026-09-01 14:21:01.450732 using pxweb R
package 1.0.0],
https://statistikdatabasen.scb.se/api/v2/tables/TAB638/data.
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
@Misc{,
title = {Population by region, marital status, age, sex and year},
author = {{Statistics Sweden}},
organization = {Statistics Sweden},
year = {2026},
url = {https://statistikdatabasen.scb.se/api/v2/tables/TAB638/data},
note = {[Data accessed 2026-09-01 14:21:01.450732 using pxweb R package 1.0.0]},
}
Kindly cite the pxweb R package as follows:
Kindly cite the 'pxweb' R package as follows:
Magnusson M, Kainu M, Huovari J, Lahti L (2026). pxweb: R Interface to
PXWEB APIs. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.pxweb
https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.pxweb, R package version 1.0.0,
https://github.com/rOpenGov/pxweb.
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
@Manual{R-pxweb,
title = {{pxweb: R Interface to PXWEB APIs}},
doi = {10.32614/CRAN.package.pxweb},
author = {Mans Magnusson and Markus Kainu and Janne Huovari and Leo Lahti},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
note = {R package version 1.0.0},
url = {https://github.com/rOpenGov/pxweb},
}
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by running pxweb_cite(px_data) and inspect the citation-generation entry point. Compare the result with the issue’s output: the duplicate “Kindly cite...” text should be removed while the data and package citations remain correctly presented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 72/100