quarto-dev / quarto-dev/quarto
Comparison between other similar tools such as JupyterBook and MystMD
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 645
- Forks
- 62
- Avg merge
- 17h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Description
I think it would be really helpful to add information to the web page on how quarto differs from other tools such as JupyterBook and MystMD/JS so that it is easier to understand how is different from quarto in terms of scope, technical capabilities, and intended use cases. This would help when deciding which tool to choose for which job. I opened a similar issue in the mystmd tracker https://github.com/executablebooks/mystmd/issues/385
Also, it seems like the issues are not public in the quarto-web repo anymore, so I'm not able to suggest that there. Is there any chance these could be public again? I remember there was a response from @jjallaire regarding quarto versus jupyter book in issue 11 but I can no longer access it.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test is identified in the issue. Review the existing Quarto web documentation and the referenced MystMD issue 385 first, then determine where a comparison of Quarto, JupyterBook, and MystMD belongs. Done means publishing an accurate comparison of scope, capabilities, and use cases, and addressing whether the quarto-web issues can be public.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100