Establish a process for monitoring and resolving CoreML GH issues, including an SLA
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
triaged
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5k
- Forks
- 1.2k
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 581
Description
🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch
Needed by GA release
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
No response
RFC (Optional)
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing the repository’s existing CoreML ownership and GitHub issue workflows, then define where the monitoring process and SLA should live. Done means the process identifies responsible owners, response targets, and how unresolved issues are tracked.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github
- Domain
- devtools, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100