A more pythonic Richards benchmark?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 203
- Avg merge
- 1h 20m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
The richard's benchmark included with pyperformance seems to be a C -> C++ -> Java -> Python port. It makes heavy use of object oriented programming and doesn't look anything like the original C code.
I've been playing with the python2 version distributed from their website. I ported it to python3. It looks more like the C version, which has some good things and a few bad things:
+ Covers non-OO programming use case
- Overloads variables as in Union[int, Type1, Type2]
I'm in the process of improving it to Optional[Type1] and Optional[Type2]
My goal is to explore a dialect of statically typed python using modern pythonic constructs:
- dataclasses
- enums
- python3 type annotations
- static transpilation via py2many
The code is here: https://github.com/adsharma/richards-benchmark. Let me know if this sounds interesting and if you'd like to update the variant in the repo at some point in the future. I hear some of the faster cpython work is using these benchmarks.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading pyperformance/benchmarks/bm_richards.py and comparing it with the Python 3 variant in adsharma/richards-benchmark. Review the proposed dataclasses, enums, type annotations, and py2many-based transpilation approach. The issue does not define an acceptance criterion; completion would require maintainer agreement on whether and how this variant should be updated in pyperformance.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100