MessageIDHeader is too strict for message-id
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
stdlib
topic-email
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
| BPO | 46392 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @warsaw, @ericvsmith, @bitdancer |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2022-01-16.00:16:30.698>
labels = ['expert-email']
title = 'MessageIDHeader is too strict for message-id'
updated_at = <Date 2022-01-18.23:49:58.192>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/bpoaugust'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2022-01-18.23:49:58.192>
actor = 'bpoaugust'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['email']
creation = <Date 2022-01-16.00:16:30.698>
creator = 'bpoaugust'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 46392
keywords = []
message_count = 8.0
messages = ['410665', '410693', '410697', '410826', '410854', '410878', '410893', '410917']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['barry', 'eric.smith', 'r.david.murray', 'bpoaugust']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue46392'
versions = []
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reading CPython's email component and the linked BPO issue 46392; done means MessageIDHeader no longer rejects valid message-id values too strictly and the relevant behavior is covered.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100