Come up with a good way to handle module aliasing
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
Research direction
No files, tests, or implementation entry points are identified. Start by reading the linked BPO issue 25649 and its discussion to determine the intended module-aliasing behavior and affected library area. The issue needs a concrete scope and an agreed definition of done before implementation can begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
| BPO | 25649 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @warsaw, @brettcannon |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2015-11-17.17:07:40.296>
labels = ['type-feature', 'library']
title = 'Come up with a good way to handle module aliasing'
updated_at = <Date 2015-11-17.17:15:47.803>
user = 'https://github.com/brettcannon'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2015-11-17.17:15:47.803>
actor = 'barry'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2015-11-17.17:07:40.296>
creator = 'brett.cannon'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 25649
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['254805', '254806']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['barry', 'brett.cannon']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'test needed'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue25649'
versions = ['Python 3.6']
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 558
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python/cpython
-
docs pending
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
build type-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
stdlib topic-email type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Similar issues
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·
-
link-check link-check:sphinx-theme
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio#1702 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
qgis/QGIS-Documentation#11275 ·
-
bug priority:normal ready-for-dev
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
OpenHands/extensions#626 · 1 comment ·