unittest API for detecting test failure in cleanup/teardown
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- testing-qa
Research direction
The issue names unittest cleanup/teardown behavior but provides no files, entry points, or tests. Review the existing unittest cleanup and teardown handling and the linked PR gh-121709 first; the issue does not define the proposed API or a concrete completion test.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
| BPO | 24249 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @rbtcollins, @ezio-melotti, @bitdancer, @voidspace, @vadmium |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2015-05-20.21:01:55.280>
labels = ['easy', 'type-feature']
title = 'unittest API for detecting test failure in cleanup/teardown'
updated_at = <Date 2020-01-29.03:22:47.048>
user = 'https://github.com/bitdancer'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2020-01-29.03:22:47.048>
actor = 'josephgordon'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = []
creation = <Date 2015-05-20.21:01:55.280>
creator = 'r.david.murray'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 24249
keywords = ['easy']
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['243694', '243703', '243704', '243720', '246703']
nosy_count = 6.0
nosy_names = ['rbcollins', 'ezio.melotti', 'r.david.murray', 'michael.foord', 'martin.panter', 'azsorkin']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'needs patch'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue24249'
versions = ['Python 3.6']
Linked PRs
- gh-121709
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 558
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python/cpython
-
docs pending
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
build type-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
stdlib topic-email type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Similar issues
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·
-
link-check link-check:sphinx-theme
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio#1702 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
qgis/QGIS-Documentation#11275 ·
-
bug priority:normal ready-for-dev
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
OpenHands/extensions#626 · 1 comment ·