[SSL: BAD_WRITE_RETRY] bad write retry in _ssl.c:1636
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- networking, security
Research direction
Start by inspecting _ssl.c around line 1636 and the original BPO issue 22499 to recover the failure scenario. The payload names no test or reproduction, so completion requires identifying the bad write-retry behavior, adding regression coverage, and confirming the SSL test suite passes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
| BPO | 22499 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @pitrou, @giampaolo, @tiran, @alex, @skrah, @dstufft, @GLolol, @xgid |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2014-09-26.01:24:30.426>
labels = ['type-bug', 'library']
title = '[SSL: BAD_WRITE_RETRY] bad write retry in _ssl.c:1636'
updated_at = <Date 2018-09-23.17:16:46.563>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/nikratio'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2018-09-23.17:16:46.563>
actor = 'tacocat'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2014-09-26.01:24:30.426>
creator = 'nikratio'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 22499
keywords = []
message_count = 9.0
messages = ['227582', '227583', '254343', '254389', '257350', '257413', '257535', '257562', '257614']
nosy_count = 10.0
nosy_names = ['janssen', 'pitrou', 'giampaolo.rodola', 'christian.heimes', 'alex', 'nikratio', 'skrah', 'dstufft', 'tacocat', 'xgdomingo']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue22499'
versions = ['Python 3.4', 'Python 3.5']
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 558
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python/cpython
-
docs pending
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
build type-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
stdlib topic-email type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bancolombia/sentinel#23 ·
-
test md OpenCI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
bug client
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100