Improve Unicode Documentation with Known Caveats
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation, internationalization
Research direction
Start by reviewing the original BPO issue 11573 and the Unicode documentation area; the payload does not identify a specific file or test. Determine which Unicode caveats are still relevant and document them in the appropriate documentation pages. Done means the known caveats are clearly covered and the documentation builds successfully.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
| BPO | 11573 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @vstinner, @mitsuhiko |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2011-03-16.17:15:40.852>
labels = ['expert-unicode', 'docs']
title = 'Improve Unicode Documentation with Known Caveats'
updated_at = <Date 2011-03-17.23:37:21.430>
user = 'https://github.com/mitsuhiko'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2011-03-17.23:37:21.430>
actor = 'eric.araujo'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Documentation', 'Unicode']
creation = <Date 2011-03-16.17:15:40.852>
creator = 'aronacher'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 11573
keywords = []
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['131143', '131291']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['vstinner', 'aronacher', 'docs@python']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'needs patch'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue11573'
versions = ['Python 3.1', 'Python 3.2', 'Python 3.3']
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 558
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python/cpython
-
docs pending
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
build type-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
stdlib topic-email type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bancolombia/sentinel#23 ·
-
test md OpenCI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
bug client
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100