Export more libreadline API functions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
Start by reviewing the attached export_more_libreadline_api.patch and the Extension Modules context. Check the dependency on bpo-23067 and compare the patch's API and documentation changes with the current readline implementation. Done means the requested libreadline functions are exported with corresponding documentation and the relevant tests pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
| BPO | 1175004 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @mwhudson, @loewis, @ned-deily, @vadmium |
| Dependencies | |
| Files |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2005-04-01.19:30:23.000>
labels = ['extension-modules', 'type-feature']
title = 'Export more libreadline API functions'
updated_at = <Date 2015-08-02.01:26:19.724>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/bruceedge'
bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2015-08-02.01:26:19.724>
actor = 'martin.panter'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Extension Modules']
creation = <Date 2005-04-01.19:30:23.000>
creator = 'bruce_edge'
dependencies = ['23067']
files = ['6584']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 1175004
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 10.0
messages = ['48122', '48123', '48124', '48125', '48126', '48127', '93159', '116708', '247841', '247848']
nosy_count = 7.0
nosy_names = ['mwh', 'loewis', 'bruce_edge', 'strank', 'ned.deily', 'sa', 'martin.panter']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'test needed'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1175004'
versions = ['Python 3.2']
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 558
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python/cpython
-
docs pending
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
build type-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
stdlib topic-email type-feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Similar issues
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·
-
link-check link-check:sphinx-theme
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio#1702 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
qgis/QGIS-Documentation#11275 ·
-
bug priority:normal ready-for-dev
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
OpenHands/extensions#626 · 1 comment ·