Nested replacement fields switch f-string lexing out of format-spec mode
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Bug report
Summary
Closing a nested replacement field inside an f-string format specifier switches the lexer to middle-string mode even though the outer replacement field remains open. Braces that follow the nested field are then parsed as escaped literal content instead of expressions in the format specifier. The shared lexer path also affects t-strings and changes the diagnostic produced for a newline after a nested field.
Reproduction Code
class X:
def __format__(self, spec):
return repr(spec)
x = X()
y = "Y"
z = "Z"
print(f'{x:{{y}}}')
print(f'{x:{y}{{z}}}')
Actual Behavior
"{'Y'}"
'Y{z'}
The second f-string passes Y{z to X.__format__(). repr() returns 'Y{z', and the remaining } is appended as literal f-string content. The corresponding t-string, t'{x:{y}{{z}}}', records Y{z as its interpolation's format specifier and places the remaining } in the following literal string.
Expected Behavior
The second f-string should treat {{z}} as a nested replacement field whose expression is the set literal {z}. It should pass Y{'Z'} to X.__format__() and print:
"{'Y'}"
"Y{'Z'}"
The t-string interpolation should likewise record Y{'Z'} as its format specifier.
Root Cause
begin_ftstring_expr() increments replacement_depth when a replacement field starts. A nested replacement field within a format specifier therefore has a greater replacement depth than its enclosing field.
When the matching } is processed, _PyLexer_close_ftstring_expr() decrements replacement_depth and unconditionally selects FTSTRING_MODE_MIDDLE. After a nested field closes, the remaining non-zero replacement depth represents the still-open outer field, whose format specifier is still being scanned. Losing that state changes how _PyLexer_get_ftstring() handles subsequent braces and
newlines.
CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-157492
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Run the two f-string examples and compare their output with the expected behavior, including the corresponding t-string case. Then read begin_ftstring_expr() and _PyLexer_close_ftstring_expr(), which the report identifies as the relevant lexer entry points; done means nested fields remain correctly handled while the outer format specifier is open.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100