python / python/cpython

email: RFC 2047 encoded-word in an addr-spec local-part corrupts address parsing

Open
#152,519 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

topic-email type-bug
Dominant language
Python
Stars
77.2k
Forks
35.9k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Bug report

The modern email parser (email._header_value_parser, used by email.policy.default and email.headerregistry) decodes an RFC 2047 encoded-word that appears inside an addr-spec local-part, and for an obsolete local-part it then re-parses the decoded text. RFC 2047 §5 forbids encoded-words in an addr-spec, and re-parsing decoded text corrupts the result — most visibly when the encoded-word decodes to a character that is special in the address grammar (e.g. =40 decodes to @).

Reproducers

Reproduced on current main (3.16.0a0); the code is unchanged since the parser was introduced, so all maintained versions are affected. The legacy compat32 parser does not decode encoded-words during address parsing and is unaffected.

An encoded-word in the local-part is silently decoded (already a violation of RFC 2047 §5):

>>> from email import message_from_string, policy
>>> m = message_from_string("To: =?utf-8?q?admin?=@example.com\n\n", policy=policy.default)
>>> m['to'].addresses[0].username
'admin'

When the encoded-word decodes to a bare special, the re-parse misaligns and the address is silently corrupted to the null address:

>>> # =40 is the Q-encoding of '@'
>>> m = message_from_string("To: =?utf-8?q?a=40b?=c@host.com\n\n", policy=policy.default)
>>> m['to'].addresses[0]
Address(display_name='', username='', domain='')

The same input through headerregistry.Address leaks an internal parse error:

>>> from email.headerregistry import Address
>>> Address(addr_spec='=?utf-8?q?a=40b?=c@host.com')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  ...
email.errors.HeaderParseError: Invalid Domain

Cause

get_local_part() parses an obsolete local-part by rendering the already-parsed tokens back to text with str() and re-parsing that text:

obs_local_part, value = get_obs_local_part(str(local_part) + value)

str(local_part) decodes any encoded-word, so the text handed back to get_obs_local_part() differs from the source. When the decoded text contains a special such as @, the re-parse stops in the middle of the rendered prefix, leaving spurious decoded characters in the remainder and corrupting the address (and, downstream, raising Invalid Domain).

Per RFC 2047 §5 an encoded-word may only appear in place of text, inside a comment, or in place of a word within a phrase (the display-name) — never inside an addr-spec. So the local-part should not be decoded at all.

Relationship to GH-136063

Found while working on GH-136063: get_local_part is one of the quadratic-complexity spots there. The fix re-parses the obsolete local-part from the original source text instead of from the decoded str() rendering, which also removes this corruption — an encoded-word in a local-part is then simply reported as an invalid address rather than decoded and misparsed.

Linked PRs
  • gh-152520

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at get_local_part() in email._header_value_parser and compare its handling of obsolete local-parts with the original source text and the decoded str() rendering. Use the RFC 2047 examples in the issue to verify that encoded-words in addr-spec local-parts are rejected without corruption or an internal parse error; gh-152520 is already linked to this work.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.