Potential Deadlock in _Py_qsbr_reserve
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Crash report
What happened?
Hello
I don't have a good unit test for it. I'm running a server under free-threading 3.14.3t build. On a larger QPS, I see a rapid unstoppable RAM increase, while CPU load is okay.
Based on a dump of active threads, I suspect a deadlock somewhere around _Py_qsbr_reserve and Stop the World:
E.g.
- This thread successfully initiated the Stop The World event and is waiting for all other threads to acknowledge and pause (park).
stop_the_worldindicates it is the one trying to stop everything.PyEvent_WaitTimedshows it is sitting there waiting for a signal that everyone has stopped.
do_futex_wait __new_sem_wait_slow _PySemaphore_Wait _PyParkingLot_Park PyEvent_WaitTimed stop_the_world type_set_abstractmethods type_setattro PyObject_SetAttr _abc__abc_init ... etc - This thread also needed to stop the world (to grow an internal array) but got blocked because anotheer already held the master lock.
_Py_qsbr_reserveshows it was trying to reserve space in the memory management system._PyMutex_LockTimedshows it is blocked waiting for a lock inside stop_the_world. This is the lock held by Thread 1.
do_futex_wait __new_sem_wait_slow _PySemaphore_Wait _PyParkingLot_Park _PyMutex_LockTimed stop_the_world _Py_qsbr_reserve PyGILState_Ensure ... etc
I suspect a modification of _Py_qsbr_reserve could help, the server thread dump does not complain about waiting on Stop the World after this modification:
Py_ssize_t
_Py_qsbr_reserve(PyInterpreterState *interp)
{
struct _qsbr_shared *shared = &interp->qsbr;
PyMutex_Lock(&shared->mutex);
// Try allocating from our internal freelist
struct _qsbr_thread_state *qsbr = qsbr_allocate(shared);
while (qsbr == NULL) {
// Unlock before stopping the world to avoid deadlocks.
// If we hold shared->mutex while waiting for the world to stop,
// we might block a thread that needs to acquire shared->mutex to park.
PyMutex_Unlock(&shared->mutex);
_PyEval_StopTheWorld(interp);
PyMutex_Lock(&shared->mutex);
// Try allocating again, as another thread might have grown the array
// or freed an entry while we were waiting.
qsbr = qsbr_allocate(shared);
if (qsbr != NULL) {
_PyEval_StartTheWorld(interp);
break;
}
// Still NULL, we must grow it
if (grow_thread_array(shared) == 0) {
qsbr = qsbr_allocate(shared);
} else {
// Failed to grow array (e.g. OOM). Break to avoid infinite loop.
_PyEval_StartTheWorld(interp);
break;
}
_PyEval_StartTheWorld(interp);
}
// Return an index rather than the pointer because the array may be
// resized and the pointer invalidated.
Py_ssize_t index = -1;
if (qsbr != NULL) {
index = (struct _qsbr_pad *)qsbr - shared->array;
}
PyMutex_Unlock(&shared->mutex);
return index;
}
Similar issues in the past:
CPython versions tested on:
3.14
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Output from running 'python -VV' on the command line:
3.14.3 (free-threading)
Linked PRs
- gh-149100
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked PR gh-149100, then trace _Py_qsbr_reserve and stop_the_world using the reported thread stacks. The issue provides no named source file, unit test, or reliable reproducer; done would require confirming the deadlock mechanism and validating a fix under the free-threading build.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- operating-systems
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100