`multiprocessing.Queue` methods have asymmetric behavior
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Bug report
Bug description:
Currently, the qsize() and full() methods rely on the semaphore value (they change their result immediately after the put operation is performed). However, the empty() method relies on the underlying pipe's readiness, which violates user expectations (since similar queue.Queue methods have symmetric behavior) and leads to the following:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import time
from multiprocessing import Process, Queue, set_start_method
CONSUMERS = 100 # any sufficiently large number
ITEMS = CONSUMERS * 100 # should result in exceeding the underlying pipe
DELAY = 1 # "infinitesimal", but it can actually be as large as you like
def consume(queue):
for _ in range(ITEMS // CONSUMERS):
if queue.empty(): # it should never be printed, but it will be
print("EMPTY!")
queue.get()
def main():
queue = Queue()
for i in range(ITEMS):
queue.put(i)
time.sleep(DELAY)
assert queue.qsize() == ITEMS
consumers = [
Process(target=consume, args=[queue], daemon=True)
for _ in range(CONSUMERS)
]
for consumer in consumers:
consumer.start()
for consumer in consumers:
consumer.join()
if __name__ == "__main__":
set_start_method("fork")
sys.exit(main())
The problem was initially noticed in one Stack Overflow question, when the queue was considered empty despite having a sufficiently large number of items. I have only cited one case, but in fact the problem will always occur when buffer flushing is too slow (especially if any complex objects are serialized).
I decided to mark this as a bug, as this behavior can be fixed as a result of solving #87302. Otherwise, I think clarifying this point in the documentation may also be sufficient.
Related (implicitly used in the above code to reproduce): #128186.
CPython versions tested on:
3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-144832
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the multiprocessing.Queue documentation for qsize(), full(), and empty(), then review the reproduction in the issue and related issues #87302 and #128186. Check linked PR #144832 and determine whether the behavior is resolved there; done means either the queue methods behave consistently or the documented behavior clearly addresses the reported case.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100