Make "perhaps you missed a comma?" hint in syntax warnings less cryptic

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

Syntax warnings for code like [][""], [](), and 1[2] finish with the hint "perhaps you missed a comma?"

>>> lambda: 1[2]
<python-input-23>:1: SyntaxWarning: 'int' object is not subscriptable; perhaps you missed a comma?
<function <lambda> at 0x705dfb04b920>

When this came up in a review of currently emitted syntax warnings, it took me a moment to realise that it was suggesting the two subexpressions might have been supposed to be separate items in a sequence definition.

While I expect this would be clearer in the context of an actual warning, in isolation it felt very cryptic. Perhaps it would make sense to expand the hint to "did you miss a comma to separate sequence elements?"

Edit: Amended proposed text as @hugovk suggested

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

No response

Linked PRs

• gh-140893
• gh-143278

Review linked PRs gh-140893 and gh-143278 first, then inspect the syntax-warning behavior for examples such as [][""], [](), and 1[2]. Done means the warning hint clearly explains that a comma may be missing between sequence elements, with the relevant warning examples still behaving as intended.