subprocess module docs contain an inconsistent mix of repeated versionchanged descriptions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Documentation
The subprocess module documentation has an explosion of repeated text in versionchanged or versionadded markers splattered over multiple APIs within the docs.
The reality is that many of these are technically all directly Popen API changes, that the other higher level preferred more user friendly APIs like run() and call() and check_call() and check_output() all make use of internally and forward a majority of their arguments to.
Examples to look for: where are cwd, input, text, encoding, errors argument behavior changes/additions mentioned vs which APIs accept these.
I noticed this when looking over the changes made in https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/101283 where it became apparent to me that we're not internally consistent in how we do this within the doc today. The doc needs some cleanup and a strategy for this.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the subprocess module documentation and issue 101283, then compare versionchanged and versionadded notes for Popen, run(), call(), check_call(), and check_output(). Check how cwd, input, text, encoding, and errors are documented across these APIs. Done means the notes follow a consistent strategy without repeated or conflicting descriptions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100