[C-API Docs] Clarify Constraints on the Arena Allocator
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentação
- Clareza
- Precisa de esclarecimento
- Status de atividade
- Estagnada
- Domínio
- api, documentation
Direção de pesquisa
Comece pela documentação vinculada da C-API para PyObject_GetArenaAllocator(), PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() e pelas orientações sobre a inicialização antes do Python; em seguida, compare as restrições de PyMem_SetAllocator. Determine e documente as restrições permitidas de inicialização, GIL, uso direto e segurança de threads; avalie separadamente se a descontinuação e uma substituição baseada em PyConfig devem ser especificadas.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
The "arena" allocator is used by obmalloc, as well as the code for allocating frames. It is exposed by the following public C-API:
PyObject_GetArenaAllocator()PyObject_SetArenaAllocator()
(It is also exposed/used internally as _PyObject_VirtualAlloc() and _PyObject_VirtualFree(). The implementation is exposed internally as _PyMem_ArenaAlloc() and _PyMem_ArenaFree().)
First of all, the docs for PyObject_GetArenaAllocator() are not clear at all about what the function should be used for. I expect it is only meant for use in combination with PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() (e.g. to wrap the old one; to check what's set). That should be clarified.
Second, the C-API docs make it clear that the two public functions may be called before the runtime is initialized. However, the following should be clarified, as there are no documented restrictions AFAICS:
- may
PyObject_SetArenaAllocator()be called after runtime init?- status quo: presumably not, since obmalloc would break (similar to the restrictions on
PyMem_SetAllocator()) - internally: we do not ever change the arena allocator
- recommendation: explicitly document that it must not be called after runtime init (a la
PyMem_SetAllocator())
- status quo: presumably not, since obmalloc would break (similar to the restrictions on
- may the allocator returned by
PyObject_GetArenaAllocator()be used directly?- status quo: possibly yes, since people may be doing so at this point (unlikely though)
- internally: we use it directly (but that's kind of the point)
- recommendation: explicitly state that it should not be used directly (point to object allocator API instead)
- ...before runtime init?
- (relevant only if direct use is okay)
- status quo: possibly yes, since people may be doing so at this point (unlikely though)
- internally: we do not use it before runtime init
- recommendation: at the least document that it shouldn't be used after runtime init
- better: state that it's only allowed when
PyObject_SetArenaAllocator()is allowed (i.e. only before init)
- must
PyObject_GetArenaAllocator()be called with the GIL held after runtime init?- (relevant only if post-init
PyObject_SetArenaAllocator()is okay) - status quo: possibly not, since people haven't needed to before (unlikely though)
- internally: we always hold the GIL
- recommendation: recommend (or require) that the GIL be held
- (relevant only if post-init
- must the allocator passed to
PyObject_SetArenaAllocator()be thread-safe (and reentrant)?- status quo: if the allocator may be used directly then possibly yes (since it seems it can be used before runtime init, as well as later without the GIL held); otherwise no (since the PyMem "object" allocator is documented as protected by the GIL)
- internally: the default arena allocator is thread-safe (and reentrant)
- recommendation: recommend that the arena allocator be thread-safe (just like the PyMem "raw" allocator)
- better: explicitly require it (so we can later drop the restriction on the PyMem "mem" and "object" allocators)
If we do specify tighter restrictions than were already documented then we'll need to consider who might be using the public functions in unexpected ways. However, I'd be surprised if there were more than a few (if any) using them at all.
Regardless, ISTM it would be better to deprecate the two public functions and replace them with a new PyConfig field. That would align a lot better with the intention. If there is a need to see if the currently set allocator matches some expected one, then it would be better to have an explicit function for that (e.g. PyObject_IsArenaAllocator()) rather than exposing PyObject_GetArenaAllocator() for that purpose.
The same goes for PyMem_SetAllocator(), where we'd have an additional PyMem_SetAllocatorWrapper() for the after-init case.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Merge médio
- 1d 9h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 558
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de python/cpython
-
docs pending
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
-
stdlib type-feature
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
-
build type-bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 76/100
-
stdlib topic-email type-feature
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
Todas as issues de python/cpython
Issues semelhantes
-
area/auth bug comp/agent P3 platform/discord type/security
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#117848 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 74/100
bancolombia/sentinel#23 ·
-
test md AbertaCI
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 74/100
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
bug client
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100