[C-API Docs] Clarify Constraints on the Arena Allocator

Aberta
#101,655 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
5/5
Tempo estimado
Mais de uma semana
Facilidade para iniciantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Documentação
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Status de atividade
Estagnada
Stack de tecnologia
c, python
Domínio
api, documentation

Direção de pesquisa

Comece pela documentação vinculada da C-API para PyObject_GetArenaAllocator(), PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() e pelas orientações sobre a inicialização antes do Python; em seguida, compare as restrições de PyMem_SetAllocator. Determine e documente as restrições permitidas de inicialização, GIL, uso direto e segurança de threads; avalie separadamente se a descontinuação e uma substituição baseada em PyConfig devem ser especificadas.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

3.11 3.12 3.13 docs topic-C-API

The "arena" allocator is used by obmalloc, as well as the code for allocating frames. It is exposed by the following public C-API:

  • PyObject_GetArenaAllocator()
  • PyObject_SetArenaAllocator()

(It is also exposed/used internally as _PyObject_VirtualAlloc() and _PyObject_VirtualFree(). The implementation is exposed internally as _PyMem_ArenaAlloc() and _PyMem_ArenaFree().)

First of all, the docs for PyObject_GetArenaAllocator() are not clear at all about what the function should be used for. I expect it is only meant for use in combination with PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() (e.g. to wrap the old one; to check what's set). That should be clarified.

Second, the C-API docs make it clear that the two public functions may be called before the runtime is initialized. However, the following should be clarified, as there are no documented restrictions AFAICS:

  • may PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() be called after runtime init?
    • status quo: presumably not, since obmalloc would break (similar to the restrictions on PyMem_SetAllocator())
    • internally: we do not ever change the arena allocator
    • recommendation: explicitly document that it must not be called after runtime init (a la PyMem_SetAllocator())
  • may the allocator returned by PyObject_GetArenaAllocator() be used directly?
    • status quo: possibly yes, since people may be doing so at this point (unlikely though)
    • internally: we use it directly (but that's kind of the point)
    • recommendation: explicitly state that it should not be used directly (point to object allocator API instead)
  • ...before runtime init?
    • (relevant only if direct use is okay)
    • status quo: possibly yes, since people may be doing so at this point (unlikely though)
    • internally: we do not use it before runtime init
    • recommendation: at the least document that it shouldn't be used after runtime init
    • better: state that it's only allowed when PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() is allowed (i.e. only before init)
  • must PyObject_GetArenaAllocator() be called with the GIL held after runtime init?
    • (relevant only if post-init PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() is okay)
    • status quo: possibly not, since people haven't needed to before (unlikely though)
    • internally: we always hold the GIL
    • recommendation: recommend (or require) that the GIL be held
  • must the allocator passed to PyObject_SetArenaAllocator() be thread-safe (and reentrant)?
    • status quo: if the allocator may be used directly then possibly yes (since it seems it can be used before runtime init, as well as later without the GIL held); otherwise no (since the PyMem "object" allocator is documented as protected by the GIL)
    • internally: the default arena allocator is thread-safe (and reentrant)
    • recommendation: recommend that the arena allocator be thread-safe (just like the PyMem "raw" allocator)
    • better: explicitly require it (so we can later drop the restriction on the PyMem "mem" and "object" allocators)

If we do specify tighter restrictions than were already documented then we'll need to consider who might be using the public functions in unexpected ways. However, I'd be surprised if there were more than a few (if any) using them at all.


Regardless, ISTM it would be better to deprecate the two public functions and replace them with a new PyConfig field. That would align a lot better with the intention. If there is a need to see if the currently set allocator matches some expected one, then it would be better to have an explicit function for that (e.g. PyObject_IsArenaAllocator()) rather than exposing PyObject_GetArenaAllocator() for that purpose.

The same goes for PyMem_SetAllocator(), where we'd have an additional PyMem_SetAllocatorWrapper() for the after-init case.

Linguagem predominante
Python
Estrelas
77.2k
Forks
36k
Merge médio
1d 9h
PRs com merge (30d)
558

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de python/cpython

Todas as issues de python/cpython

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Python

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.