python-poetry / python-poetry/poetry

Reference extras in tool.poetry.extras

Open
#5,471 3 comments 36 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

kind/feature status/triage
Dominant language
Python
Stars
34.3k
Forks
2.5k
Avg merge
2d 19h
Merged PRs (30d)
30

Description

  • I have searched the issues of this repo and believe that this is not a duplicate.
  • I have searched the documentation and believe that my question is not covered.

Feature Request

Currently we can define extras like this

[tool.poetry]
name = "awesome"

[tool.poetry.dependencies]
# These packages are mandatory and form the core of this package’s distribution.
mandatory = "^1.0"

# A list of all of the optional dependencies, some of which are included in the
# below `extras`. They can be opted into by apps.
psycopg2 = { version = "^2.7", optional = true }
mysqlclient = { version = "^1.3", optional = true }

[tool.poetry.extras]
mysql = ["mysqlclient"]
pgsql = ["psycopg2"]
databases = ["mysqlclient", "psycopg2"]

I have a monorepo where I use a single pyproject.toml file to describe different runtime options (by using extras). It would be cool if the last line in the above could be changed to the following

databases = ["mysql", "pgsql"]

I.e. being able to extend other extras. The same goes for the upcoming tool.poetry.group feature.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the pyproject.toml examples for tool.poetry.extras and the referenced upcoming tool.poetry.group feature. Determine how nested extras should be represented and resolved, then define completion criteria for accepting names of other extras while preserving existing dependency behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
build-system, tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.