python-hyper / python-hyper/rfc3986
uri_reference.is_valid() accepts invalid hostnames and out-of-range ports
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 189
- Forks
- 38
- Avg merge
- 13h 36m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
The validator returns True for inputs that violate URI rules.
Examples:
In [15]: uri_reference('google.com/path').is_valid()
Out[15]: True
In [27]: uri_reference('http://example.com:99999/').is_valid()
Out[27]: True
Expected behavior:
The validator should reject missing schemes when a hostname is present
and should reject port values greater than 65535.
Actual behavior:
is_valid() returns True for both invalid inputs.
Steps to reproduce:
- Run the two example expressions in a Python REPL.
- Observe that both return True.
Environment:
Library version:
Python version: Python 3.10.14
OS: Windows
Fix? :
- Add port range validation and treat bare hostnames with paths as invalid
- unless explicitly allowed by the spec.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing both examples in a Python REPL and trace how uri_reference(...).is_valid() validates hostnames and ports. Done means bare hostnames with paths and ports above 65535 are rejected, with tests covering both reported inputs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100