Possible inaccuracy in extension typespec
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 59
- Forks
- 94
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I just realized a possible inaccuracy: This documents instance attributes, not parameters. In which case the old docstring was (almost) correct. (sources is still a list[str], not a list[string | os.PathLike] because of os.fspath)
Originally posted by @Avasam in https://github.com/pypa/distutils/pull/311#discussion_r1903354895
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the extension typespec and its associated docstring, then compare whether each annotation describes instance attributes or parameters. Verify the issue's claim that sources is list[str] rather than list[string | os.PathLike], and consider the work complete when the documentation and typespec accurately describe the intended values.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100