Improving readme
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I just had a look at the readme, and I think it could use some updates keeping in mind the target audience.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think users would be mostly interested in,
- what this is: the first paragraph is OK
- how to use it: right now it's not clear to me how to use this from the readme
As to the detailed generation process, well it's interesting but pretty technical and so maybe not something users need to be aware at first.
Also, some CI with a badge in the readme would really add confidence that this is a maintained project that can be relied on (speaking as a user).
Thanks for working on this project :)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the repository README and its current explanation of how users should use the project. Restructure the user-facing guidance so usage is clear, keep detailed generation information secondary, and add the requested CI status badge; done means the README answers the stated user questions and shows CI status.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- ci-cd, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100