pymc-devs / pymc-devs/pytensor
Scipy solve allows more `assume_a` flags in 1.15
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
linalg
SciPy compatibility
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 644
- Forks
- 208
- Avg merge
- 2d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Description
Description
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy-1.15.0/reference/generated/scipy.linalg.solve.html
The default is no longer gen, scipy evaluates the matrix to decide which type to use. This led to a failing test, but more importantly we should consider allowing some of the new flags
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by examining the PyTensor integration with scipy.linalg.solve and the failing test mentioned in the issue. Compare the supported assume_a values with those available in SciPy 1.15, then determine which flags should be accepted and verify the relevant tests pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100