Is support for in-place operations intentional?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bug
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 1h 19m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Do we really want to support in-place operators like iadd in the standard library? I think this contradicts our philosophy of workflows.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files or tests. Start by locating handling for in-place operators such as iadd and reviewing the project’s workflow philosophy; then determine whether this support is intentional. Done means the project has a decided direction and the affected behavior or documentation is aligned with it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100