please add a comparison with highlight package (which is better than source-highlight)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 885
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
(Original issue 1315 created by timotheecour on 2016-12-31T17:26:43.853012+00:00)
In the process of picking the right tool [see also http://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/38481/gnu-source-highlight-alternative/38485#38485]
I see a comparison in http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2009/07/adding-color-to-console-pygments-vs.html against source-highlight; but source-highlight seems dead and highlight is better (eg 212 languages supported); is there a comparison to highlight?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No target file, documentation page, or test is named. Start by locating the existing comparison with source-highlight and reviewing the linked highlight documentation; done means adding a comparison with highlight that addresses the tool's capabilities and suitability.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100