concat fails due to StringDtype introduced by pd.Index
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 4.2k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Avg merge
- 2d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Description
What happened?
This used to work (a few releases of xarray and/or pandas ago):
import xarray as xr
import pandas as pd
da = xr.DataArray([0], dims=["dim_a"], coords=dict(dim_a=["a"]))
db = xr.DataArray([0])
# use concat to add a new dimension with coordinate
db2 = xr.concat([db], pd.Index(["b"], name="dim_a"))
xr.concat([da, db2], dim="dim_a") # this fails
But now fails with TypeError: Cannot interpret '<StringDtype(storage='python', na_value=nan)>' as a data type because the pd.Index apparently introduces a StringDtype coord, while the coord of da has dtype <U1.
Replacing the pd.Index with xr.Variable still works:
import xarray as xr
import pandas as pd
da = xr.DataArray([0], dims=["dim_a"], coords=dict(dim_a=["a"]))
db = xr.DataArray([0])
# use concat to add a new dimension with coordinate
db3 = xr.concat([db], xr.Variable("dim_a", ["b"]))
xr.concat([da, db3], dim="dim_a") # this succeeds
Not sure what the bug is here: should pd.Index use <Ux or StringDtype by default? Should xarray.DataArray, when initialized with string coordinates, use <Ux or StringDtype by default? Or should concat know how to handle mixed string types?
At least I find this current situation confusing. If this is not a bug, it might perhaps warrant mentioning this difference between pd.Index and xr.Variable in the concat docs?
What did you expect to happen?
No exception
Minimal Complete Verifiable Example
import xarray as xr
import pandas as pd
da = xr.DataArray([0], dims=["dim_a"], coords=dict(dim_a=["a"]))
db = xr.DataArray([0], dims=["dim_b"], coords=dict(dim_b=["b"]))
# use concat to add a new dimension with coordinate
db2 = xr.concat([db], pd.Index(["b"], name="dim_a"))
xr.concat([da, db2], dim="dim_a") # this fails
Steps to reproduce
No response
MVCE confirmation
- Minimal example — the example is as focused as reasonably possible to demonstrate the underlying issue in xarray.
- Complete example — the example is self-contained, including all data and the text of any traceback.
- Verifiable example — the example copy & pastes into an IPython prompt or Binder notebook, returning the result.
- New issue — a search of GitHub Issues suggests this is not a duplicate.
- Recent environment — the issue occurs with the latest version of xarray and its dependencies.
Relevant log output
Anything else we need to know?
No response
Environment
xarray: 2026.4.0
pandas: 3.0.2
numpy: 2.4.4
scipy: 1.17.1
netCDF4: None
pydap: None
h5netcdf: None
h5py: None
zarr: 3.1.6
cftime: None
nc_time_axis: None
iris: None
bottleneck: None
dask: 2026.3.0
distributed: None
matplotlib: None
cartopy: None
seaborn: None
numbagg: None
fsspec: 2026.3.0
cupy: None
pint: None
sparse: None
flox: None
numpy_groupies: None
setuptools: 82.0.1
pip: 26.1
conda: None
pytest: 9.0.3
mypy: 1.20.2
IPython: 9.12.0
sphinx: 9.1.0
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Run the provided minimal example with xarray, pandas, and NumPy, then trace the two xr.concat calls and the coordinate types produced from pd.Index versus xr.Variable. Determine the intended handling of mixed string dtypes, and consider the issue resolved when the example completes without an exception with regression coverage for the reported case.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- numpy, pandas, python
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100