IV Models: CATE or LATE?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 4.8k
- Forks
- 827
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Just wanted to clarify something - for the IV models (such as OrthoIV or ForestDRIV), is the ate() method computing the local average treatment effect for compliers (using the ITT and the compliance rate), or just the ITT?
Thank you!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by examining the ate() method in the mentioned IV models, OrthoIV and ForestDRIV. Determine whether its result represents the local average treatment effect for compliers or the ITT, then document that behavior and clarify how compliance rate relates to the returned value.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100