py-why / py-why/EconML

SingleTreeCateInterpreter used for continuous treatment

Open
#768 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Jupyter Notebook
Stars
4.8k
Forks
827
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I am new to Econml. I wang to ask can SingleTreeCateInterpreter be used for continuous treatment to show a tree structure ?Or can continuous treatment be showed in a tree structure?
When I used continuous treatment, SingleTreeCateInterpreter could not output a figure while it worked for binary treatment

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at the SingleTreeCateInterpreter entry point and reproduce the reported behavior with a continuous treatment, comparing it with the working binary-treatment case. Determine whether continuous-treatment tree output is supported; done means either a confirmed limitation with clear guidance or a working figure for that case.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
jupyter-notebook
Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.