py-why / py-why/EconML

Are propensity scores calibrated?

Open
#693 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Jupyter Notebook
Stars
4.8k
Forks
827
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

When using a tree-based, non-parametric model to generate the propensity score in double robust estimation, are the resulting probabilities calibrated?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are mentioned. First clarify which tree-based propensity-score estimator and double-robust workflow in EconML are in scope, then define the calibration evidence and expected outcome before implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.