Why is the default n_trees=1000 in ForestDRLearner?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 4.8k
- Forks
- 827
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
That seems rather large, especially as in CausalForestDML the default is n_estimators=100, and the ForestDRLearner with n_trees=1000 can take quite a while to fit. Also for example in XGBoost, also a tree method, the default number of trees is 100.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the ForestDRLearner and CausalForestDML definitions and comparing their tree-count defaults. Check how ForestDRLearner's n_trees affects fitting time and whether documentation or tests encode the current value. Done means reaching a maintainer-supported default decision and updating the relevant behavior and references.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100