using variable inside block of type check leads to "stack level too deep (SystemStackError)"
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 558
- Forks
- 224
- Avg merge
- 1h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Describe the Bug
I've written a catch_error with followup type check to =~ Error exactly like written in the bolt docs "catching errors in plans". If I use the variable inside the block of the type checking the plan crashes with a "stack level too deep (SystemStackError)". The idea is to nest the original error for deeper debugging cases.
Expected Behavior
Plan doesn't crash and returns the defined custom error defined in the fail_plan line and is able to include the original error within the new error details hash.
Steps to Reproduce
plan somemodule::test() {
$t = Target.new('some-target')
$group = 'some-nonexistent-group'
$add_or_error = catch_errors(['bolt.inventory/validation-error']) || { $t.add_to_group($group) }
out::message("add_or_error: ${add_or_error}")
if $add_or_error =~ Error {
fail_plan('group not found in inventory', 'inventory/not-found', { 'group' => $group, 'error' => $add_or_error }) # this fails
# fail_plan('group not found in inventory', 'inventory/not-found', { 'group' => $group }) # this works but we are missing the original error
}
return 'it did it!'
}
Environment
- Version 4.0.0 (also happens in 3.30.0)
- Platform Devuan daedalus (debian bookworm)
Additional Context
$ bolt plan run somemodule::test --format json
add_or_error: Error({'msg' => 'Group some-nonexistent-group does not exist in inventory', 'kind' => 'bolt.inventory/validation-error', 'details' => {'path' => []}})
/opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.2.3/lib/concurrent-ruby/concurrent/atomic/thread_local_var.rb:71:in `value': stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/context.rb:56:in `lookup'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet.rb:284:in `lookup'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/pops/loaders.rb:120:in `implementation_registry'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/pops/types/type_calculator.rb:536:in `infer_Object'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/pops/visitor.rb:94:in `visit_this_0'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/pops/types/type_calculator.rb:270:in `infer'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/pops/types/type_calculator.rb:289:in `infer_set'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/puppet-8.10.0/lib/puppet/pops/types/type_calculator.rb:160:in `infer_set'
... 8080 levels...
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bolt-4.0.0/lib/bolt/cli.rb:394:in `execute'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bolt-4.0.0/exe/bolt:11:in `<top (required)>'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/bin/bolt:25:in `load'
from /opt/puppetlabs/bolt/bin/bolt:25:in `<main>'
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the plan from the issue, then trace the recursion through Puppet's type calculator, especially puppet/pops/types/type_calculator.rb and the infer_set path shown in the stack trace. Confirm the fix by rerunning the example through the bolt CLI and verifying that the plan returns the custom error with the original error in its details hash without a SystemStackError.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- cli, devops
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100