Review Union/Either type design
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
area/languages
kind/enhancement
language/java
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 85
- Forks
- 26
- Avg merge
- 11h 49m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Description
Hello!
- Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
- If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)
Issue details
Notes from Pawel (from #1):
- no `Union<T0, T1 ... TN>`, just `Either<L, R>`, but I haven't seen
it used with 3 or more types, and I've had an implementation ready
from another project
Affected area/feature
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no file, test, or entry point; start by reviewing its Union/Either design notes and the implementation from another project mentioned there. Done means reaching a decision on whether Pulumi Java should support Either<L,R> or a broader union design.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100